Category Archives: Work

Disgrace: AdWeek’s “Mom Achiever” Survey Results

One of the topics that generates the highest traffic on my blog and the most comments, along with the most feedback from readers on the WM FB page is the topic of work-life choices. Additionally, this is one of those rare topics that compel people to send me individual emails. It is no surprise to anyone that this topic is so interesting for women because there is no easy answer. It is a constant daily struggle for so many women. We already know there is no such thing as “balance” – so instead we focus on choices. And the reason we struggle with these decisions is because it’s all about time and compromise – what are we giving up to gain, what are we missing by going to work, what are we missing by staying home, what about the kids?

Etc. Etc.

At least this image isn't offensive like the one on the AdWeek web site

So along comes this  new AdWeek study about us – mothers in the age range of most of my readers (far as I can tell from those sneaky FB “insights” I get from those of you who hang out on my FB page). According to AdWeek’s latest survey, we are driven and highly educated. Sure, we already  knew that because well, Moi Loves Moi, so of course we are fabulous.

Also according to AdWeek, 42% of us would rather receive a 50% increase in pay than spend 50% more time with our children.

REALLY?

First – what did the other MAJORITY of women say who answered differently than those 42%?

And if there were any truth to these results,  why would we be so fascinated with the topic of work-life CHOICES? If it were true, then we wouldn’t care so much because we’d love laying around in our bed of money.

As someone who studied statistics pretty deeply in graduate school, I’d love to know more about this absurd survey question. I mean, if you asked me, hey – you can keep going to work AND get paid 50% more for it – but it doesn’t mean you get 50% more time with your kid, it just means your hours stay the same, and you get paid 50% more – I’d say

OF COURSE.

But if someone said, you can keep your job, and your salary, AND get 50% MORE TIME with your kid because now you are working part-time but for a full-time salary- then I’d choose that option .

Confused?

That’s my point. Exactly what did they ask the survey respondents? What other questions were they asked?

And I’m sorry, depending on the kind of weekend I just had, I might have just said I’d rather get to work to get a break from my kids too – but it doesn’t mean I mean it – so was that really a question that people were meant to answer seriously?

Speaking of serious questions, was there any intent on the part of AdWeek to actually generate some helpful insights into working moms? Questions that might help force some change in business attitudes towards the struggle women face in managing their careers and their families? The very real, daily struggle that millions of moms are dealing with? Questions that might provide advertisers some true insight into these driven women who also spend money easily on the Internet – to allow them to build campaigns that resonate with us?? Or they think that insulting us somehow motivates us to $pend money?

These questions are empty and strike me as something written by non-parents to generate some headlines instead of using the money spent on this research to garner real insight into today’s working mom. Also, no shit we want more personal time, AdWeek. Find me any generation of mothers who wouldn’t have said the same thing. Going to work every day isn’t unique to craving personal time. Find me any stay-at-home mother who has personal time while raising young kids? Please – where is she? So again, personal time is the best you could do?

For a more productive and insightful read into work-life choices, read this interview with Ann Mukherjee, senior vice president at Frito Lay. My biggest take-aways from her interview is the important reminder that this is a journey, not a destination, and that helps keep focused on the bigger picture view of our decisions – and that we learn from failure.  Two things driven women who are short on personal time, easily lose sight of.

To keep up with the interesting discussion of these survey results, and other fun work-life conversations, be sure to “Like” the Wired Momma FB page.

Wife…No Qualms About It

Below is a post I wrote two years ago – March 29, 2010 – about being a wife. I think Lisa Belkin is either running out of topics or is just having fun baiting people on this topic because I wrote this in response to something she wrote for the NYT Motherlode blog back then…and now she’s covering it again two years later on her new blog with HuffPost. When I wrote this, I had just recently quit working full-time and was still very burned out from work and just sort of enjoying adjusting to a completely different life of being home with my 2 kids. Now two years later, I’m doing a lot more “work” that I get paid for but I’m still doing it from home. My thoughts on this topic – which are essentially this: What in the world is wrong with the word wife – remain the same – whether I am bringing in any income or not. Might it be because I have a sort of partnership with my husband that feels fair to us – trust me, I wasn’t going to say “balanced” or “equal” because if I tried to lead you to believe he knows how to find clothes in the 3-year-old’s room or runs off to the grocery store with a list running through his head – I’d welcome you to come burn and pillage my front yard.  So after exploring working moms the other day, I offer you some retro-WM on WIVES.

————————————————————————————————————————————

Totally what we all look like

I feel like on a pretty regular basis, I read articles lambasting the idea of being a “wife.” Often they tread lightly around the issue of how this might also imply being a mother-at-home with little or no regular income. But generally, what I read, is a distaste for the idea of being a wife. Usually women are writing it. And each time I am confused. I’m never clear on why being home all day, raising your kids, keeping the house going, getting the groceries, dealing with laundry, playing with the kids, etc – why these are bad things?

I think for some people it can be super draining and boring but for others, it’s not. It just depends. I fall in the “it’s just not” category.

And then I read Lisa Belkin’s piece in yesterday’s NYT Magazine, “The Marrying Kind”, and I felt like while she was headed towards lambasting the notion of a wife, she just flirted with it and then, to my surprise,  moved on to suggest that a new generation of women might enjoy being a wife.

Who says that generation doesn’t exist now? So let’s review – I have officially been home full-time for one year  now. And  I still love it. People still dance around it – with the leading question – are you BORED?
If you ask me this question then you haven’t spent all day, every day, for weeks and months on end, tending to 2 small children.  Mine are almost 4.5 years and 16 months.

But I think the bigger question for others isn’t that I’m bored with my time during the day, most people know 2 small children is a ton of work,  it’s that I’m bored not using my brain. Au Contraire Mon Frere. And here’s why I can say this with such confidence – I chose to leave my career. I was lucky enough to have the option, financially, and I was ready. That’s the crux of it. I didn’t feel pushed out, I didn’t feel like I had no choice, and I wasn’t just sort of wavering out there in professional confusion. I feel like this is what gets skipped over so frequently by the media, by researchers and even by friends and colleagues. I left my career after a strong run that I was really proud of, I wrote speeches for CEOs, attended White House Correspondents Dinners, helped manage media crises for a big industry in high profile moments in time, and sat through plenty of painful staff meetings and technical meetings that ran on into perpetuity. I left when I was ready and I left when I felt fulfilled. I felt like I didn’t have anything big to prove any more.  I felt proven.

I also left at a point in time when I knew that to keep going would mean the next level – and the next level would mean more time away from my family and more time at work – not something I wanted. Some do. I didn’t. I did only before I had children.

So I am happy being a wife. I love that this week is spring break and I have activities planned out each day for my kids, ranging from easter egg dying parties to cherry blossoms and White  House sight seeing, to the playing at the park in the warm sunny 70 degree weather. When I think about work, I think about internal politics, difficult bosses, meetings that waver from agendas and waste everyone’s time and stupid deadlines.  So would I rather being doing laundry and drawing cats and dogs for the 5,000th time, or would I rather be sitting in a staff meeting listening to that one person who loves to hear themself talk, drone on for an extra 20 minutes?

For me, the answer is real easy. Being home is fulfilling, exciting, challenging and exhausting in an entirely different way than being at work. And being here is a privilege every day and a choice I made without reservation. It fascinates me that so many in the media have such trouble realizing that liberated, educated, intelligent women can choose to be a wife and love it.

Belkin talked about how a new generation of women might be embracing the role of the wife and that is due, in part, to the attitudes of the men they are with – these men welcome responsibilities at home, making appointments, attending school events, juggling household duties. So the women can pass off some work to their husbands, and we can buy frozen pie crusts and farm out housework to a cleaning lady. Again, a new generation of women is doing this? Or this is already happening? Cause I’m pretty sure we are well entrenched in that reality over here in my house.

I’d love to stop seeing pieces on how being a “wife” is a bad thing. It seems so out-of-touch to me.

As always, if you’d like to hear more on wife-hood and the short-comings of husbands, among other such titillating subjects, be sure to “Like” the Wired Momma FB page. Otherwise you are missing out, friend.

Juggling Moms – is there a Shangri-La to work and life?

The law does not mandate work-life balance,” nor does it “require companies to ignore and stop valuing ultimate dedication, however unhealthy that may be for family life,” said Judge Preska this summer regarding the Bloomberg discrimination against pregnant and working mothers case.

“There’s no such thing as work-life balance,” Mr. Welch told the Society for Human Resource Management’s Conference a few years ago. “There are work-life choices, and you make them, and they have consequences.”

“Once you get off the escalator, you don’t get back on,” said my investor relations professor in graduate school, to a room filled with 20-something women who were eager to achieve career success and planned on eventually having children. We all looked nervously at each other after hearing what this woman, a wildly successfully IR PR professional for a Fortune 500 company, a Northwestern University graduate school professor and mother, had to say to us so very bluntly. Could she be right, we all worried?

Each of these statements are harsh, unforgiving, blunt and brutal. But are they wrong? Among the world of Type A, educated, successful, intelligent women, in this eternal quest for “balance” and “juggling” – are we creating expectations that just aren’t realistic?

Please tell me that this isn't what I look like handling my life

Balance implies equal parts, right? Juggling, well aside from the fact that creepy circus clowns are the only people who actually juggle, isn’t the idea of juggling meant to be fun? You’ve mastered a sport, you are having fun, you are showing off your talents. Do any of these things sound remotely like what it is like to have a career and a family?

Not in my experience.

Welch might hail from an 80s-era business philosophy of good-old boys and face-time in the office, things that we are slowly chipping away at with time and technology but is his statement actually antiquated and incorrect? I don’t think so. We individually decided to have children knowing that it would change our lives forever and dramatically. And from my almost 6 years in, the biggest consequence is not the lack of sleep, the unwanted lines appearing on my face, the amount of time I’ve spent cleaning hynies or even having to say that word, or wasted hours watching the same “Backyardigans” episode on repeat. The biggest consequence is the fundamental change in my career.

But I don’t view it as a permanent one or that I’ve been victimized in the work place. I actually disagree with my grad school professor that once you get off the escalator you can’t get back on. But it would be naive for me to think I’d get back on in the same spot and continue on the same path. The thing is, if I wanted that, I wouldn’t have stepped off.

Ultimately, we can “mommy track” ourselves and have more time to see our kids after school, take them to playdates, get them to the doctors when they are sick, volunteer in class and all these other things that happen during the business day. What I don’t understand is why this is viewed as a bad thing instead of the reality of choosing to create more time for our kids, to the detriment of our career.

Or, we can remain on the upward trajectory of high-achieving business success, the kind that shatters glass ceilings. And in making that choice, we know that someone else will spend more time raising our children than we are. But that is our decision. I guess what I’m saying is I don’t disagree with Welch and I don’t disagree with Judge Preska. Ask someone without children how they feel about working parents getting promoted above them if the working parent spends fewer hours in the office, travels less, and comes in late more?  Those people don’t care about our reasons because we decided to have the family.

Doesn't she look confident and in charge?

The good news is I think that we don’t need to be making final and ultimate decisions right now. I think the work place has evolved into an arena where you can stay in the game, take on less, but in time, ramp back up. I think that instead of spending our time on this eternal quest for the shangri-la of motherhood, the ultimate in work-life balance, we need to do what we talked about a few weeks ago -see the whole picture – see that there are ebbs and flows to life and own our decisions, be proud of them, and be at peace with the consequences of them. So may of us have periods of work intensity but perhaps it can follow with a period that is more family focused, we can get promoted but then maybe we want to remain at that level for longer than our pre-children selves imagined we would. We can try to stay home, realize we don’t like it, and return to work with more vigor and dedication than we had before but with a peace of mind that we are proud of this decision because we’ve tried the other way. We step off the escalator and let our future selves worry about how and when we get back on, knowing the financial implications this brings to our household.

I firmly believe that what makes you “supermom” is owning your decision, recognizing the consequences and accepting the reality that you can’t give it all to both. “Balance” is for the birds, as my mom would say. Own it, be realistic about the consequences, realize life constantly changes and be proud of it.

What do you think? Is there such thing as work-life balance? Can you be wildly successful at work and also have “enough” time with your kids? Do you think you can step off the elevator and get back on?

Enough Already of “Work-Life Balance”

I'm losing count of how many times I've used this image but doesn't it say it all?

For today’s blog post, I hope you’ll click on over to my piece on HuffPost DC about work-life “balance” – a word I loathe, despise and wish would just be deleted from our vocabulary (in this context). I also can’t stand mommy guilt, for what it’s worth.

Anyhow – please read and share and comment and tell me what you think!